Home | Contents | The Editors | Guidelines | Articles | Co-Inquiry Blog | Media | Links | FAQs

Table of Contents

Meet the members of the editorial board.


What is the Co-Inquiry Journal?

Written by Shareen Abramson

ABOUT THE JOURNAL

The Co-Inquiry Journal explores innovative approaches for early childhood education, early childhood teacher education and professional development. In connection with journal articles, an educational weblog (blog) includes multimedia documentation from early childhood classrooms and programs that facilitates interchange among early childhood educators on the practical applications of theory and research.

For more information on the co-inquiry process, see the summary below.

In collaboration with the D. Paul Fansler Institute for Leadership in Early Education and the Joyce M. Huggins Early Education Center at California State University, Fresno, the Co-Inquiry Journal is linked to the Co-Inquiry Blog, a resource for educational interchange for the articles appearing in the journal. In using the blog, participants are able to contribute their own analyses and reflections concerning the documentation as well as links to research and other resources for professional development.

The links for each article are indicated in the body of the paper. The Co-Inquiry Blog is password protected and separate registration is required.

Visit this link to see a sample blog from the journal.

The Co-Inquiry Journal is published quarterly (Spring, Summer, Fall and Winter) by Semiotic Concepts. By registering for the journal, you will receive an email when the new edition becomes available.

SUBMITTING TO THE JOURNAL

E-mail a cover letter, one copy of the article and links to electronic documentation to webmaster@coinquiry.org. APA style should be used in preparing the paper. Authors do not receive fees or royalties for papers selected for publication. The journal does not accept articles already published elsewhere in print or electronic format and expects that articles have not been simultaneously submitted to other publications.

ABOUT THE WEB DEVELOPMENT GROUP

SHAREEN ABRAMSON, Ph.D., is the D. Paul Fansler Chair for Leadership in Early Childhood Education, Director of the Joyce M. Huggins Early Education Center (Huggins Center) and Coordinator, Graduate Program in Early Childhood Education at California State University, Fresno (Fresno State). She earned her PhD (1981, Early Childhood Education) from Peabody College for Teachers - Vanderbilt University, MA (1978, Curriculum and Instruction) from Antioch University and BA (1972, English) from UCLA. Her writing and research interests include: innovative approaches in early education, diverse learners, early literacy and professional development. Her previous classroom teaching experience spans infant/toddler, preschool, kindergarten and primary grades. Find out more about Shareen's professional journey

Shareen has recently embarked on a new professional adventure, developing the Co-Inquiry Journal and the Co-Inquiry Blog to improve learning, teaching and professional development. These online educational projects use documentation to facilitate research and dialogue among a community of scholars and practitioners to promote “communicative literacy,” a new standard for education and curriculum development.

OTTO BENAVIDES, Ed.S., is Associate Professor, Curriculum and Instruction, Director, Instructional Technology Resource Center and Director, NASA Education Resource Center at Fresno State. Otto is an Apple Distinguished Educator with expertise in international exchange and collaboration.
http://education.csufresno.edu/facstaff/benavides_o.htm


GARY ROGERS, MA, is the Studio Teacher at the Huggins Center. He enjoys designing classroom resources and providing technical and arts training for teachers. His interests include art, linguistics, photography, and music.

 

 

 


CHRIS RATZLAFF, BA, is a teacher at the Huggins Center. His interests include digital art and graphics, ceramics, painting, and carpentry.

 

Web Design by Signs 4 Action

What is the Co-Inquiry Meeting? A Summary

DOCUMENTATION — COMMUNICATION — ACTION:
Co-inquiry meetings for facilitated interchange

Summary

Collaborative inquiry (co-inquiry) meetings facilitate professional interchange for the purpose of making change. A practical way for educators to collaborate and learn from one another using documentation, co-inquiry heightens the focus on children’s development and learning, promotes interaction, enhances communicative literacy and creates a culture of professional development.

The co-inquiry meeting is held weekly in a comfortable setting and lasts about two hours. Only one or two presentations are made. An individual within the group may act as the facilitator. The format for the co-inquiry meeting includes three stages: documentation, communication and action:

Documentation

  • A participant begins the co-inquiry by presenting documentation of a classroom experience to the group. The presentation should consider a problem, an observation or a situation of interest rather than a specific project or learning activity.

Communication

  • Each participant takes a turn to describe an aspect of the experience that was interesting, important or provocative.
  • Each participant takes a turn to ask a question concerning the implications of the experience for understanding teaching or learning (questions are not necessarily answered at this time and may require additional reading or classroom research).

Action

  • Participants move to open dialogue and brainstorming on how the experience could continue to be developed.
  • Based on the comments, questions and ideas, the presenter creates a “plan of possibility” that might be explored with the children in the coming week.
  • Documentation of these new experiences becomes the basis for future inquiry meetings and the continuation of the process.

To summarize, after the presentation of documentation (Stage I), communication proceeds in a circular fashion (Stage II). Each participant has a chance to comment, ask for clarification or raise a question (or pass) in the order of seating. In the action discussion, participants freely brainstorm their ideas and collaborate on planning with the presenter (Part III).

Alternatives to on-site co-inquiry include meetings before or after work and electronic interchange such as the Co-Inquiry Blog.

Abramson, S. (Spring, 2006). DOCUMENTATION — COMMUNICATION—ACTION: Co-inquiry meetings for facilitated interchange (Summary). Co-Inquiry Journal, 1(1), 3-4.

© All rights reserved. This publication is protected by copyright and permission should be obtained from the author prior to any prohibited reproduction, storage in a retrieval system, or transmission in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or likewise. The author can be contacted at: shareena@coinquiry.org

Download the summary in PDF format

Return to the Main Index of Issues

Questions or comments? Please send us your feedback